Touring tyre - Michelin?

Got a technical query? Found another 0.02bhp? Ask/tell the world.

Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul

Motocod
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:47 am

Touring tyre - Michelin?

Post by Motocod »

Hi all,

Got a few longish trips coming up and need to select a rear tyre that won't square off too badly. Currently running a Pilot 2CT, and wondered what other's experiences are of different Michelins that might work ok with my almost new 2CT front.

Thanks,

Nik
tanneman
Member
Posts: 1203
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: Terra Firma

Post by tanneman »

Pilot road 4. [/u]
'Let me check my concernometer.'
User avatar
The Teutonic Tangerine
Posts: 1649
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by The Teutonic Tangerine »

R1100S

Road pilot (not the 2, 3 or 4 but the original) Won't square off until you have done about 5000 miles.
There would appear to be a surfeit of prolixity and sesquipedalian content today please do not use a big word when a singularly un-loquacious and diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish the contemporary necessity
User avatar
Boxermed69
Member
Posts: 1282
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:28 am
Location: Costa del Weymouth

Post by Boxermed69 »

Don't know about combining with the 2CT front, but I've been very pleased with the Pilot Road 2s - that's feel, wet grip, longevity and resistance to squaring off. Just fitted another set :D I got 6.5K miles out of the last pair; front and rear worn out together, mind. The front held its profile and the rear simply would not square off. In fact both tyres wore out on the shoulders not the centre. 3K miles on mainly minor roads (no motorways at all) in France and Spain last year may help to explain that :D

Was going to try PR3s as they're reportedly even better but couldn't pass up £160 for a pair of PR2s (thanks Al).

Mike
Horizontally opposed, vertically challenged...
Image
User avatar
Blackal
Posts: 8261
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:53 pm

Post by Blackal »

Not sure if the PR2 (which was a superb tyre, I thought) - has been in production for several years now - so if you feel that tyres go off with age, then perhaps don't go hunting them out - as they should be old stock.

PR3 supposed to be better still, and the subsequent PR4 an improvement again. While the improvement of 3 over 2 and 4 over 3 might not be groundbreaking - I'm fairly certain that no-one is saying that the 2 is better than the 3 or 4.

I think all the PRs are compatible also. (PR2 front, PR4 rear) etc.

Al
If I am ever on life support - Unplug me......
Then plug me back in..........

See if that works .....
:?
Motocod
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:47 am

Post by Motocod »

Good stuff, thanks guys.

Seems like maybe the 2CT is more of a sports-oriented tyre. On my second one now, and it's nearly done - only done about 3k on it, so not exactly long-lasting.

I'll check out the PR series, thanks again.

Nik
User avatar
Blackal
Posts: 8261
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:53 pm

Post by Blackal »

Yes - the 2CT was standard fare on a high percentage of pure sports bikes, for several years, but realistically - the Pilot Road was a better tyre for most people.

I don't think you'll find the PRoad tyres lacking for roads and even the odd track day.......

Al
If I am ever on life support - Unplug me......
Then plug me back in..........

See if that works .....
:?
SP250
Posts: 985
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Shropshire

Post by SP250 »

Just put a Mich PR3 on the rear of my R1100S as they don't make a PR4 in 170 size for the 5" wide rim, only a 180 which needs a 5.5" rim.
John M
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic