Bender wrote:I have a HGV licence so I have to have a full medical every five years to retain my licence entitlement.Harry Lime wrote:I'll repeat my appeal for annual, or bi-annual eye tests for anyone over the age of, say, 60 (dunno about the age, but the line has to be drawn somewhere).
My direct experience of three aging parents was that it wasn't their road sense, nor their reactions - (and I don't think reaction times should be a factor for road driving or riding, unless seriously eroded ) but their eyesight.
To drive you need to be able to (a) see the road (b) see the instruments and (c) judge distance and speed of approaching vehicles.
People usually notice when they can't read the newspaper anymore - that's (b). But for the other items, eyesight can deteriorate seriously without the person noticing.
But of course, what I'm recommending is STATE CONTROL!!!!! Aieeeeeee! So all the gun-totin' hanging and flogging right wing will have none of it. Oh, and of course, it will cost money, and that's all theirs, of course.
H.
This year the doc told me that my long sight didn't meet the standard for the HGV licence and that I couldn't drive anything until I got glasses.
After a moment of panic I asked him what he meant by 'anything' - he said he meant lorries, and that my eyesight was fine for cars and motorcycles.
That strikes me as ridiculous.
I have an HGV licence too but to be honest the medical isn't really that strict - one example is blood pressure - I forget what the requirement is but I know as diet controlled diabetic, the doctor wants my blood pressure lower than what is required for the HGV medical