Brake fluid spec question

Got a technical query? Found another 0.02bhp? Ask/tell the world.

Moderators: Gromit, Paul, slparry

markwin
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:06 pm

Brake fluid spec question

Postby markwin » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:35 pm

I am going to renew the clutch fluid on my r1100s 2004 could you advise me as to whether DOT 5 is ok as I have read that this may have a detrimental effect on the seals , the manual states DOT 4.Have no issue with buying this but I have a new bottle of DOT 5 so if it is def ok to use this I have it.Any thoughts as not sure as to the compatability,Regards Markwin. :?:

Twinspark
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:15 pm

Postby Twinspark » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:39 pm

DOT 5 or DOT 5.1?

That's a very small but very important detail.

5.1 is interchangeable with DOT 4, but DOT 5 is silicone based and really should only be used in a clean system built for silicone fluids (usually race cars / bikes - it's not really a road fluid).
Fucked Off!

markwin
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:06 pm

Postby markwin » Sat Nov 30, 2013 6:14 pm

Going to have to double check what I actually have , thought it was DOT5 and checked on the label that it was compatible with DOT 4 -so if it is dOT 5.1 there will be no issues with using this ? The safest option is to get some DOT4 and would have if I didn't have some (possibly!) compatible fluid.

Twinspark
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:15 pm

Postby Twinspark » Sat Nov 30, 2013 6:53 pm

If it's DOT 5.1, then it's completely interchangeable / compatible with DOT 4.
Fucked Off!

markwin
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:06 pm

Postby markwin » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:42 pm

Thanks for the responses Twinspark , checked I have DOT5.1 and it is apparently compatible as you say , wouldn't have given another thought to using this but saw a thread that implied poss concerns with DOT5.1 and the seals , cannot find the thread again as I wanted to double check I had not misread it and was about using DOT5-a BIG no no ! Kind Regards Markwin.

User avatar
tanneman
Member
Posts: 1203
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: Terra Firma

Postby tanneman » Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:38 pm

What Wikipedia says.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOT_5.1

No need to use Dot 5.1 for everyday use, it makes more sense if you are an occasional track day goer. It only raises the boiling point like 30degC. Dot 5 requires the replacement of all seals in the braking system. You are more likely to use this in a racing application where a higher boiling point is desirable.

I wait till after winter to change brake fluid because the bikes don't get much use.
'Let me check my concernometer.'

markwin
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:06 pm

Postby markwin » Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:32 pm

Just to be clear I was not implying that I could take any advantage of the slightly higher boiling point of DOT 5.1 over DOT4 it was just that I had DOT 5.1 on my shelf.There are of course sometimes advantages of using an "upgraded" specification but you need to ask yourself is it merely a marketing ploy or a real world improvement ,like everything else in life look at what the angles are and don't just assume.

Twinspark
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:15 pm

Postby Twinspark » Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:09 pm

I spec. 5.1 for my MX5 and Alfa 75 - but that's because they both venture out on track days.

Not convinced you'd need it on a road bike - or even a track bike, given the better ventilation the braking system has on a bike.
Fucked Off!

dave the german
Member
Posts: 3614
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:35 am
Location: North East

Postby dave the german » Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:07 am

my mountain bike uses DOT 5.1 - but there again, it needs it for the speed I get up to :wink:
'15 R1200GS TE
'06 R1200S
'04 BCR
Yam SR 500 long term restoration
wanna win the lottery and ride my bike

Manfred
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:49 am
Location: York, UK

Postby Manfred » Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:08 pm

Dot 5, avoid like the plague unless the system already uses it.

Dot 5.1, also non hydroscopic, that alone makes it worthwhile.
Should have near infinite shelf life and in a sealed and working system should never need changing.
Over the hill and picking up speed on the long downhill to death.

2001 R1150RS (registered in 2002).

User avatar
Herb
Member
Posts: 1808
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:49 pm
Location: Lutterworth, Midlands

Postby Herb » Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:59 pm

Manfred wrote:Dot 5, avoid like the plague unless the system already uses it.

Dot 5.1, also non hydroscopic, that alone makes it worthwhile.
Should have near infinite shelf life and in a sealed and working system should never need changing.


Dot 5.1 is hygroscopic. In road systems this is a desirable property as it means water is absorbed. Although performance is degraded over time, the water does not collect in the system the way it can with dot 5 which is silicon and non hygroscopic.
********Jim********
---------------------------
2006 'Colgate' R1200s

Manfred
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:49 am
Location: York, UK

Postby Manfred » Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:17 pm

"5.0 is silicon based. 5.1 is a synthetic fluid. If you mix 5.0 with any other fluid, the silicon precipitates out and blocks the lines. 5.1 mixes with other fluids like 4.0 with no problem (bit like mixing full synth oil with mineral oil).

5.1 is seal friendly. It doesn't absorb water, so you don't get water is the system at all, unlike other fluids which draw water from the atmosphere (hygroscopic). I've used it for years and NEVER had spongy brakes"

This is a quote from a race tech who also uses it in his own road bikes.
Over the hill and picking up speed on the long downhill to death.



2001 R1150RS (registered in 2002).

User avatar
Herb
Member
Posts: 1808
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:49 pm
Location: Lutterworth, Midlands

Postby Herb » Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:22 pm

Dot 5.1 does absorb moisture. Dot 5 does not.
********Jim********

---------------------------

2006 'Colgate' R1200s

Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Postby Corvus » Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:38 pm

Herb wrote:
Manfred wrote:Dot 5, avoid like the plague unless the system already uses it.

Dot 5.1, also non hydroscopic, that alone makes it worthwhile.
Should have near infinite shelf life and in a sealed and working system should never need changing.


Dot 5.1 is hygroscopic. In road systems this is a desirable property as it means water is absorbed. Although performance is degraded over time, the water does not collect in the system the way it can with dot 5 which is silicon and non hygroscopic.


Hi herb. How does the water get in there in the first place, with dot5? Even if it did (which I doubt), it would be separate and therefore easy to bleed out, no?

I've read that lever return issues are the main reason why dot5 is not widespread?

You sure that hygroscopic is good? Doesn't sound it!

Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Postby Corvus » Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:47 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOT_5.1

This bears out what herb was saying.

In essence, water is bad in all cases, but it if it HAS to be in there, it is better suspended in the brake fluid and not separate, it seems?

But how does water get into a system filled with dot5?


Return to “Boxertech”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests