Speeding- NOT me - Sorry, you are still GUILTY Sir!!!!

Pull up a chair - let's talk Boxerbollox

Moderators: Gromit, Paul, slparry

Post Reply
User avatar
adamski49
Posts: 1004
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:59 am
Location: Cambridge

Postby adamski49 » Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:29 pm

Stevie wrote:
adamski49 wrote:Legal principles are what makes solicitors, barristers and the like wealthy and I for one don't want to support that.


Adam :)


Fair enough. Let's just hope your never in a position where you're reliant on one to represent you.


I was. It cost me a fortune on top of the fine. I still got banned. I won't bother again.
Forgive me father for I have sinned... ex S owner moved onto pastures new with four cylinders and a chain... and back to a twin, albeit in a V.
Top
Stu
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Bromley

Postby Stu » Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:58 pm

If the equipment has been properly tested and configured for all vehicle types then there is no problem.

The eqipment MCN refers to has not been tested and has been proved to be inaccurate. How can reading from this equioment be used for a prosecution?
Top
User avatar
PBBoxer
Posts: 3211
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Postby PBBoxer » Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:44 pm

Where does it actually stae anywhere that you are guilty until proven innocent?
Nowt's changed law wise so why the worry?

There have been a number of cases where the speed guns have been proven to be innacccurate, so as far as im concerned its fine for MCN to play teh game and try to get them banned, however the standard of journalism is POOR
1997 CBR1100XXV
1999 CBR1100XX
2009 HP2 Sport
2006 R1200s
2013 R1200RT anniversary
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Boxerbanter”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests